Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
SAGE Open Med ; 11: 20503121231160962, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2309409

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Differences in demographic factors, symptoms, and laboratory data between bacterial and non-bacterial arthritis have not been defined. We aimed to identify predictors of bacterial arthritis, excluding synovial testing. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional survey was performed at a university hospital. All patients included received arthrocentesis from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Clinical information was gathered from medical charts from the time of synovial fluid sample collection. Factors potentially predictive of bacterial arthritis were analyzed using the Student's t-test or chi-squared test, and the chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis. The resulting subgroups were divided into three groups according to the risk of bacterial arthritis: low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk groups. Results: A total of 460 patients (male/female = 229/231; mean ± standard deviation age, 70.26 ± 17.66 years) were included, of whom 68 patients (14.8%) had bacterial arthritis. The chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis revealed that patients with C-reactive protein > 21.09 mg/dL (incidence of septic arthritis: 48.7%) and C-reactive protein ⩽ 21.09 mg/dL plus 27.70 < platelet count ⩽ 30.70 × 104/µL (incidence: 36.1%) were high-risk groups. Conclusions: Our results emphasize that patients categorized as high risk of bacterial arthritis, and appropriate treatment could be initiated as soon as possible.

2.
J Int Med Res ; 50(2): 3000605221083751, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1714566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The characteristic features, including blood test data, of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) versus influenza have not been defined. We therefore compared the clinical parameters, including blood test data, of COVID-19 and influenza. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted at Juntendo University Nerima Hospital. We recruited patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 who underwent blood tests. For comparison, we recruited an equivalent number of patients who were diagnosed with influenza and who underwent blood tests. RESULTS: During the study period, 228 patients (male:female, 123 [54.0%]:105 [46.0%]; age, 54.68 ± 18.98 years) were diagnosed with COVID-19. We also recruited 228 patients with influenza (male:female, 129 [56.6%]:99 [43.4%]; age, 69.6 ± 21.25 years). An age of 15 to 70 years (vs. 71 years), breathing difficulty, and malaise were significantly more common in patients with COVID-19 than in those with influenza. However, nausea, body temperature >38.1°C, and white blood cell count >9000/µL were more common in patients with influenza. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are useful for differentiating COVID-19 from influenza, and these findings will be extremely helpful for future practice as we learn to coexist with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(1): 116-119, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1440193

ABSTRACT

As the first authorized COVID-19 vaccine in Japan, the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is utilized for mass vaccination. Although efficacy has been proved, real-world evidence on reactogenicity in Japanese personnel is needed to prepare the public. Healthcare workers in a large academic hospital in Japan received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine from March 17 to May 19, 2021. Online questionnaires were distributed to registered recipients following each dose, from day 0 through day 8. Primary outcomes are the frequency of reactogenicity including local and systemic reactions. Length of absence from work was also analyzed. Most recipients self-reported reactogenicity after the first dose (97.3%; n = 3254; mean age [36.4]) and after the second dose (97.2%; n = 3165; mean age [36.5]). Systemic reactions following the second dose were substantially higher than the first dose, especially for fever (OR, 27.38; 95% CI, [22.00-34.06]; p < 0.001), chills (OR, 16.49; 95% CI, [13.53-20.11]; p < 0.001), joint pain (OR, 8.49; 95% CI, [7.21-9.99]; p < 0.001), fatigue (OR, 7.18; 95% CI, [6.43-8.02]; p < 0.001) and headache (OR, 5.43; 95% CI, [4.80-6.14]; p < 0.001). Reactogenicity was more commonly seen in young, female groups. 19.3% of participants took days off from work after the second dose (2.2% after the first dose), with 4.7% absent for more than two days. Although most participants reported reactogenicity, severe cases were limited. This study provides real-world evidence for the general population and organizations to prepare for BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Japan and other countries in the region.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , BNT162 Vaccine , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Japan , RNA, Messenger/genetics , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry ; 49(9):1493-1498, 2020.
Article in Japanese | JAMA Network | ID: covidwho-964196
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL